In the Media

Growing Pains for Detroit’s Urban Farms

DETROIT, Mich.—On a sunny summer afternoon, an ice cream truck sits parked near Woodrow Wilson and West Euclid Street in Detroit, in front of two boarded-up homes with sagging porches and shin-high grass. The doors bear signs warning that the homes are facing foreclosure and imminent transfer to the Detroit Land Bank. The truck’s jingle rings down the block, clanging along with wind chimes. Nearby, a man maneuvers a riding lawnmower in circles around a vacant lot; another batters nails down into his front steps, blanketed with astroturf.

Alyssa Trimmer adjusts a sprinkler hooked up to the side of her house. It douses rows of collards and tomatoes in raised beds. The homes that once stood on each side were dismantled long before Trimmer and her partner arrived here from Pittsburgh four years ago.

The house that they purchased for $15,000 in 2012—now a farm and hostel dubbed the Detroit Homestead—is bordered by four vacant lots. One came bundled with the home. Another was tax distressed going back a decade, and the owner lived in Amsterdam. Once the city foreclosed on it, Trimmer acquired it at auction for just over $1,000. Had she waited until the property reverted to the Detroit Land Bank, the public authority tasked with amalgamating and shedding blighted or vacant lots, Trimmer might have paid less. It was a gamble, but Trimmer decided to opt for the security of ownership, whatever the cost. “It was at the end of the summer, so we were able to scrape together what we needed,” she says.

In Pittsburgh, she was too nomadic to put down roots—and there was no space for them to take hold. “I didn’t even have a fire escape,” she says. Indoors, she built a hydroponic herb garden for basil and tarragon. But having grown up as a 4-H kid, rambling with rabbits and pigs, she craved more.

Despite a constellation of odd jobs—bicycle mechanic, rickshaw driver—Trimmer and her partner found it difficult to pay their bills. “So much of our existence in Pittsburgh was working our asses off just to scrape by,” she says. In the course of a decade, they moved almost 20 times, trying to outrun creeping rents. They “couldn’t afford not to move to Detroit,” Trimmer says, where the cost of living is lower.

The first year in Detroit, they plunged shovels into the grass, loosening the compacted dirt. Then, over time, the soil became healthy enough to sustain pole beans, melons, and winter squash. Now, their hostel—that initial investment they made in the land—pays their bills. Trimmer has set up a vegetable patch and beehives across the rest of the parcels, but she’s technically squatting on them until she manages to purchase them from the city. The uncertainty is scary. If that purchase doesn’t pan out, she reminds me, her work “could completely be undone.”

Urban farmers such as Trimmer are a growing force in Detroit. An estimated 1,400 of them cultivate around 400,000 pounds of fresh produce in the metro area each year.

Detroit has no shortage of land, but accessing it can prove difficult for many farmers who worry that the tide of development is sweeping by without them. The Detroit Land Bank holds 95,387 parcels of property that are up for sale. Yet dozens of farmers describe years of agitating for land ownership without success. As the city sets about the business of doling out resources and revitalizing blighted neighborhoods, the question is: why is it taking so long for urban farmers to access land? And can the mosaics of community gardens and farms flourish amid larger-scale development projects?

Hungry for land

Trimmer says she often calls the Land Bank to check on the status of the lots next door and reiterate her interest. She also goes to block meetings to get face time with city officials.

“That should be enough—I mean, hopefully,” she says. “It’s not a guarantee. There’s always a chance it could not go well.” Trimmer worries that someone else could swoop in and scoop up the land she’s been farming, and that she’d have little legal recourse if they did.

One barrier to access, farmers say, is a lack of transparency about the land acquisition process. In 2012, the Detroit Food Policy Council, an inter-agency advisory committee, convened a listening session at a local food bank. More than 200 residents turned out, many seeking clarity about public land sales. Drawing upon written and public comments, the council prepared a report recommending that the city make the process more transparent, facilitate a mix of projects—large, small, community, and corporate—and give priority to purchasers looking to secure land in the neighborhood in which they reside.

In a speech at the listening session, Dan Carmody, the CEO of the nonprofitEastern Market, described some of the administrative bottlenecking endemic to a system that funnels paper records from various agencies into a single database. “Some of these titles… are so complicated and so convoluted and so mixed up, it could take a team of attorneys decades to unravel one single parcel,” he said. “[The owner could be] the second cousin from the third nephew down in Kentucky that came up and went back but is now in upstate New York.”

Four years later, some residents continue to feel excluded from the process. Tracking down land ownership records often remains difficult for both the Land Bank and citizens. Before the city entered its bankruptcy, many organizations filed applications to purchase lots and never heard back. “The city had some pressing issues they were working on, probably. It’s not hard to figure out that it was an interesting time in Detroit,” says Craig Fahle, director of public affairs at the Detroit Land Bank. “We’ve been sorting through a lot of that kind of stuff.”

Two years ago, Brittany Bradd, an activist in Detroit’s Brightmoor neighborhood, bought an acre of land that she planned to farm. Ever since, she’s been trying to buy an additional property that remains in limbo. “Some lots are just paperwork in boxes,” she says. Another farmer told me that he plans to visit the Land Bank in person—he wants to leave with a receipt in hand.

While some farmers attribute the delays to bureaucratic mishaps, others view them as evidence that the city is privileging some types of land use—and owners—over others. High-profile sales of large tracts of land have proved controversial—particularly the Hantz Woodlands project, which saw 2,000 parcels sold to a financier in 2012 for $0.08 per square foot. The Hantz project was narrowly approved by the city council, which must bless any purchase that exceeds 10 parcels. But the sale galvanized activists who felt the developer got away with a land grab. As the city continues to seek large development projects, some residents worry that it’s opening itself up to speculators and absentee landlords. “You have one set of rules for developers, where they pretty much do what they want,” says Greg Willerer, who runs a farm in the North Corktown neighborhood.

Farmers, by contrast, are already investing in the land, and should be rewarded for adding equity and eyes on the street, says Willerer. “We’re very vigilant. We’re out here working all the time: no one’s going to break into that house, because I’m right there,” he says. “We’re out here watching all day while we’re working, and that creates a safer, better neighborhood.”

Previous research, synthesized in a literature review by the Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, noted a link between community gardens and farms and increased property values within a 1,000-foot radius. The relationship is especially pronounced in disadvantaged areas, the researchers found. Plus, Willerer notes, there’s plenty of land to go around. “It’s not like we’d be stifling or getting in the way of development,” he says. “There’s more than enough land in this city for everyone to do stuff: go-kart tracks, petting zoos, strip malls.”

One garden in the Cass Corridor district was dismantled in 2011, after a neighboring business purchased the city-owned land the growers had claimed. Some perennials were dug up and carried away; the site was slated to become a fenced-in parking lot. By expanding, the business—a doggy day-care facility—would generate additional payroll taxes for the city. “It would be irresponsible for us to turn down revenue,” the Detroit City Council member Saunteel Jenkins, chair of the planning committee, told Crain’s Detroit Businessat the time. “The reality is this city cannot rebound unless we find a way to generate taxes, and small businesses are what helps the city thrive.”

Today, city officials describe a less antagonistic relationship with Detroit’s urban farmers. “We acknowledge that land security is a need, as much for the community gardens as the folks who are earning a living off of urban agriculture,” says Erin Kelly, the lead landscape architect at the city’s planning and development office. Kelly says that, for farmers, start-up costs are irrevocably sunk into the land itself; moving to a new location can be extremely complicated.

Fahle admits that the dispersal of land isn’t happening as quickly as residents would like—a pace he attributes to an abundance of caution and a desire to align with the longer-term vision of the planning and development department. “We want to make sure that we’re doing this right,” he says. “We are creating sanity out of what was madness.”

Meanwhile, the Land Bank is unloading some parcels via the Side Lot program, through which homeowners who are up-to-date on their property taxes can purchase land immediately adjacent to their houses. When a property is demolished, Fahle says, the Land Bank mails a postcard to neighbors, who can then request a deed. “Anybody who is eligible to buy a side lot, we want them to get it,” Fahle says. As of July, Detroit has demolished more than 10,000 homes under the banner of blight removal, and the Land Bank has held numerous Side Lot fairs across the city—pop-up field offices with laptops and printers where prospective buyers check in with the county treasurer and leave with a deed. “One guy was trying to buy his lot for four years from the city; it took us 40 minutes,” Fahle says. Those lots go for $100. By the end of the summer, Fahle expects to have sold 5,000.

“A new typology of neighborhoods”

Activists and officials agree that existing agriculture doesn’t necessarily jeopardize long-term planning. Still, some advocate dramatic change. They’re angling for tangible policies that reprioritize fresh produce and recast the role that farming can play in a modern American city.

On one hand, there’s an age-old desire to demarcate between urban and rural spheres, says Malik Yakini, co-founder of the Detroit Black Community Food Security Network, which runs D-Town Farm. Many people subscribe to the idea that “urban life is superior to rural life, that farming is low-class work, and that it’s not something that is to be desired,” Yakini says. Speaking at a food sovereignty panel at the Congress for the New Urbanism in Detroit earlier this summer, Ashley Atkinson, director of the advocacy group Keep Growing Detroit, lamented this stigma, saying: “We still believe farming is for stupid people who can’t figure out anything else to do.”

Increasingly, though, Detroit is experimenting with the idea that urban areas can look more stereotypically rural. There have been moments of accord between farmers and the city. The Detroit Future City plan, an elephantine urban planning framework put forward in 2012, proposed that some land be reserved for farming, green infrastructure, and environmental remediation.

Click here to read the full article in CityLab.
Jessica Leigh Hester. August 30, 2016, CityLab

Blog

DFC Implementation Office is Seeking Neighborhood Engagement Coordinator

The Detroit Future City (DFC) Implementation Office is seeking a full-time AmeriCorps member to serve as a Neighborhood Engagement Coordinator. The member will be responsible for engaging new residents and further engaging existing volunteers in implementing best practices for vacant lot use. Ideally, the candidate will begin service on October 1, 2016 and serve a minimum of 1,700 hours through the end of his/her term on July 31, 2017.

Click here for more information about this position.

In the Media

Must Detroit Shrink to Survive?

When the city of Detroit emerged from the nation’s largest-ever municipal bankruptcy almost two years ago it was left with a razor-thin financial cushion.

Now Detroit’s downtown is booming with new investments.

But much of its outer-lying neighborhoods remain abandoned.

And Detroit officials are weighing precisely where to concentrate the city’s scant resources.

Detroit is huge – 139 square miles.

At its height in the 1950’s the Motor City had almost 2 million residents.

Now, after decades of lost manufacturing jobs and at times outright public corruption, Detroit has a population of less than 700,000.

Hope Amid Desolation

One of the most desolate, and dangerous, neighborhoods is called Brightmoor.

Yet on the front porch of a modest single family home Dawn Wilson-Clark sits in a pocket of hope, one of hundreds of homes built about a decade and a half ago to push back against the overwhelming blight.

And actually my ex-husband was not happy about this location,” Wilson-Clark said. “I told him don’t worry about it, they’re gonna tear that house down, they’re gonna tear these houses down, and in ten years the neighborhood is gonna be different and we’re gonna be a part of that. He didn’t agree. And I’m still here with a wonderful new husband, ha, who is helping me be a part of the change.”

Wilson-Clark says she has to drive her children miles away from Brightmoor so they can attend decent schools.

But she also says her kids have had positive entrepreneurial and artistic experiences in Brighmoor she doubts would happen anywhere else in the city.

She wonders if Detroit officials will consider that when they determine how much service to provide to the mostly-decayed area.

Wilson-Clark said, “I just hope residents are at the table when those decisions are being made. We have endured the blight, the turmoil, the gun shots, the crime. But we’ve stayed in our communities because we wanted to be there. We need to have a voice.”

Different Futures

City officials say that message has been received. Or so says Detroit’s chief city planner, Maurice Cox.

All these neighborhoods have a future. They don’t all have the same future,” Cox said.

He came to Detroit after helping guide the rebuilding of flood-ravaged New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina.

But Cox says in many ways the situation in Detroit is worse.

One of the challenges that Detroit has is because it’s so large, whenever you invest in the public realm you can barely see it because often it’s spread so thinly. And where investors see the public resources, they tend to gravitate,” Cox said.

Yet Cox says the mostly-vacant outskirts offer a unique opportunity.

We can go in and green 20 acres,” Cox said. “Like how many neighborhoods in America can you go in and do that? And then actually employ people from that neighborhood as a part of the green collar workforce. And then on the flip side we have probably the largest inventory of historic structures that are available for reuse in the country.”

Cox vows that Detroit will continue providing water, electricity and police protection to all neighborhoods, even those that are desolate.

But he predicts that will become increasingly unnecessary as rebuilding continues in Detroit communities that are beginning to thrive.

Cox said, “So if you have a chance to live in a neighborhood where you can walk within 20 minutes of your house to grocery, fresh produce, greenways, quality schools. Or you can live in an area where you don’t have many neighbors anymore, the services are inadequate. Where would people rather live?”

Weighing Options

It’s a question other groups are pondering as well.

At a kind of think-tank called Detroit Future City, Executive Director Anika Goss-Foster points to a map of projects she says are flourishing in impoverished neighborhoods that are proving unexpectedly resilient.

Must Detroit Shrink to Survive?
Quinn Klinefelter. August 15, 2016, WDET

Blog

DFC Implementation Office is Seeking Graphic Design Firm

The Detroit Future City (DFC) Implementation Office is seeking a graphic design firm that can provide one year of graphic design services for the DFC Implementation Office, with the materials outlined in the link below being completed within the first three to four months. The graphic design firm will subcontract under the DFC Implementation Office’s prime contractor for communications, Van Dyke Horn Public Relations.

Click here for more information about this graphic design opening.